Palavras-chave
Metodologias Ativas
Aprendizagem Ativa
Educação Inovadora
Autonomia
Resumo
Este artigo investiga a Sala de Aula Invertida como uma metodologia ativa inovadora no contexto educacional contemporâneo, apresentando a necessidade de transformação na educação diante dos desafios atuais e destacando a Sala de Aula Invertida como uma resposta eficaz. Através de fundamentação teórica, são exploradas Metodologias Ativas e correntes pedagógicas, a evolução da educação e os princípios da Sala de Aula Invertida. É detalhada a implementação prática, abordando o planejamento da inversão, ferramentas tecnológicas e o papel do professor/aluno. Explora-se ainda os benefícios e desafios de tal metodologia, enfatizando o impacto na motivação, engajamento e no desenvolvimento de habilidades críticas e autonomia. Destaca-se a avaliação da eficácia, considerando não apenas métricas acadêmicas imediatas, mas também medidas qualitativas e a retenção do conhecimento a longo prazo. Ao abordar considerações éticas, foca-se na equidade, transparência e integridade acadêmica na implementação da Sala de Aula Invertida. Assim, a Sala de Aula Invertida não apenas oferece uma metodologia prática, bem como representa uma transformação mais profunda no paradigma educacional. Sua contribuição inclui uma abordagem centrada no aluno, estímulo ao pensamento crítico, redefinição do papel do professor e ênfase na avaliação formativa. Além de apresentar a Sala de Aula Invertida como uma metodologia ativa, o artigo proporciona uma análise abrangente, oferecendo aspectos valiosos para educadores comprometidos com aprimorar a experiência de aprendizagem e desenvolvimento dos alunos.
Referências
ADAMS, J. S. Inequity in Social Exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, v. 2, p. 267-299. New York: Academic Press, 1965.
AMBROSE, S. A. et al. How Learning Works: Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2010.
AUSUBEL, D. P. The Psychology of Meaningful Verbal Learning. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1963.
BANDURA, A. Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1977.
BARROWS, H. S. Practice-based Learning: Problem-based Learning Applied to Medical Education. Springfield, IL: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, 1994.
BATES, A. W. Teaching in a Digital Age: Guidelines for Designing Teaching and Learning. 2015. Disponível em https://opentextbc.ca/teachinginadigitalage. Acesso em 25 out 2023.
BERGMANN, J.; SAMS, A. Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education, 2012.
BEAUCHAMP, T. L.; CHILDRESS, J. F. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 6ª ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
BLOOM, B. S. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Company, 1956.
BONWELL, C. C.; EISON, J. A. Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. Washington, DC: The George Washington University, 1991.
BRANSFORD, J. D.; BROWN, A. L.; COCKING, R. R. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 2000.
BRUNER, J. S. The Culture of Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.
COSTA JÚNIOR, J. F. et al. Metodologias Ativas de Aprendizagem e a Promoção da Autonomia do Aluno. RECHSO - Revista Educação, Humanidades e Ciências Sociais, V. 07. N.14, p. 01–23, 2023. DOI https://doi.org/10.55470/rechso.00092. Disponível em: https://periodicos.educacaotransversal.com.br/index.php/rechso/article/view/92. Acesso em 01 nov. 2023.
DEWEY, J. Experience and Education. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1938.
DEWEY, J. Democracy and Education. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. New York, NY: Free Press, 1916.
DECI, E. L.; RYAN, R. M. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum, 1985.
ENNIS, R. H. A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In J. B. Baron & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice, W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co, p. 9-26, 1987.
FINK, L. D. Creating Significant Learning Experiences: An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2003.
FREIRE, K. M. de A. et al. O uso da tecnologia na construção de ambientes de aprendizagem colaborativos e inclusivos. Revista Internacional de Estudos Científicos, [S. l.], v. 1, n. 2, p. 51–70, 2023. DOI: 10.61571/riec.v1i2.118. Disponível em: https://periodicos.educacaotransversal.com.br/index.php/riec/article/view/118. Acesso em: 01 nov. 2023.
FREIRE, P. Pedagogia do Oprimido. Editora Paz e Terra, 2014.
FULLAN, M. The New Meaning of Educational Change. New York: Routledge, 2007.
GARDNER, H. Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st Century. New York: Basic Books, 1999.
GARRISON, D. R.; ANDERSON, T. E–Learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. London: Routledge/Falmer, 2003.
GUSKEY, T. R. What Makes Professional Development Effective? Phi Delta Kappan, v. 84, n. 10, p. 748-750, 2003.
HATTIE, J. Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. New York: Routledge, 2017.
HATTIE, J.; TIMPERLEY, H. The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, v. 77, n. 1, p. 81-112, 2007.
HEW, K. F.; LO, C. K. Flipped Classroom Improves Student Learning in Health Professions Education: A Meta-Analysis. BMC Medical Education, v. 18, n. 1, p. 38, 2018.
JOHNSON, D. W.; JOHNSON, R. T. Learning Together and Alone. Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning. Allyn and Bacon. 1994.
JONASSEN, D. H.; REEVES, T. C. Learning with Technology: Using Computers as Cognitive Tools. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology, p. 693-719. New York: Macmillan, 1996.
KIM, M. et al. The Experience of Three Flip Teaching Case Studies in an Urban University: An Exploration of Design and Implementation Variability. The Internet and Higher Education, v. 22, p. 37-50, 2014.
KNOWLES, M. S. Self-Directed Learning: A Guide for Learners and Teachers. Chicago: Association Press, 1975.
KNOWLES, M. S. Andragogy in Action: Applying Modern Principles of Adult Learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1984.
LAGE, M. J.; PLATT, G. J.; TREGLIA, M. Inverting the Classroom: A Gateway to Creating an Inclusive Learning Environment. The Journal of Economic Education, v. 31, n. 1, p. 30-43, 2000.
MAYER, R. E. Multimedia Learning (2ª. ed). New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
MISSILDINE, K. et al. Flipping the Classroom to Improve Student Performance and Satisfaction. Journal of Nursing Education, v. 52, n. 10, p. 597-599, 2013.
NCTM - National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1989.
NILSON, L.B. Teaching at Its Best: A Research-Based Resource for College Instructors. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, 2016.
PIAGET, J. Piaget's theory. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael's manual of child psychology, v. 1, p. 703-732. New York: Wiley, 1970.
PIAGET, J. To understand is to invent: The future of education. Grossman Publishers, 1973.
PRINCE, M. Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research. Journal of Engineering Education, v. 93, n. 3, p. 223-231, 2004.
PUENTEDURA, R. SAMR and TPCK: Intro to Advanced Practice. 2014. Disponível em: http://hippasus.com/resources/sweden2010/SAMR_TPCK_IntroToAdvancedPractice.pdf. Acesso em 20 out 2023.
RAWLS, J. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.
ROGERS, C. R. Freedom to Learn: A View of What Education Might Become. Columbus, OH: Merrill, 1969.
ROUSSEAU, D. M. Psychological Contracts in Organizations: Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1995.
SIEMENS, G. Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, v. 2, n.1, p. 3-10, 2005.
SIEMENS, G.; LONG, P. Penetrating the Fog: Analytics in Learning and Education. EDUCAUSE Review, v. 46, n. 5, p. 30-32, 2011.
SWELLER, J. Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning. Cognitive Science, v. 12, n. 2, p. 257-285, 1988.
TOFFLER, A. Future Shock. New York: Random House, 1970.
TOMLINSON, C. A. How to Differentiate Instruction in Mixed-Ability Classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 2001.
UNESCO. Shaping the Future We Want: UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development (2005–2014) Final Report. 2014. Disponível em https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000230171. Acesso em 20 out 2023.
VYGOTSKY, L. S. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. 1978.
WENGER, E. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Educação, Humanidades e Ciências Sociais